Journal of Atrial Fibrillation – Journal of Atrial Fibrillation & Electrophysiology (JAFIB-EP)
Chief Content Creator
Chief Content Creator - EP Essentials & Academy of Medical Education.
Education:
Associates of Cardiovascular Technology; Sioux Falls, SD
Registered Cardiovascular Electrophysiology Specialist
Certified Electrophysiology Specialist
Certified Cardiac Device Specialist
Registered Cardiovascular Invasive Specialist
Biography:
I started my career as a cardiovascular technician and soon undertook the project of learning electrophysiology. As I gained the ability to discern waveforms and grasp the basic principles, I became intrigued. Along my journey, I began to recognize patterns, interpret pacing maneuvers, and gain proficiency. The more I understood, the more I was able to contribute and be an asset during the procedure—an extra set of eyes to prevent complications, a patient advocate, with the ability to engage with the physician on diagnosis and treatment strategies.
Thanks to Dr. Scott Pham who continued to question and challenge me, I became RCES, CEPS, and CCDS certified. With my self-made study materials, I joined Wes Todd to coauthor “EP Exam Review” which has become a staple for many attempting the IBHRE.
Next, I joined Abbott in Arizona to learn a whole new aspect of electrophysiology while continuing to write my educational material. In 2021, I launched EP Essentials LLC along with Dr. Paul Haas and Scot Felton with a complete online EP program and the “Understanding EP: A Comprehensive Guide” textbook set.
CRM Educator and Instructor and Content Creator
Academy of Medical Education. Arizona, USA
CRM Educator and Instructor and Content Creator
CRM Educator/Instructor/Content Creator - Academy of Medical Education
Education:
The University of Arizona: Bachelor of Science in Microbiology
Biography:
Kim O’Donogue is a Cardiac Rhythm Device Technician/Field Support Specialist in Phoenix, AZ. She has over ten years in the CRM/EP space having supported cardiac lead extraction procedures for years before moving over to the CRM/EP implant space. Kim is passionate about CRM devices and device management and has a special interest in device education. She regularly trains new device technicians, AHPs, and Fellows, as well as industry representatives.
Some atrial under sensing is observed (circled in red). The P waves that are not being sensed are followed by a native R wave that is therefore being counted as a PVC. The P wave measurement was < 0.2mV, and the atrial impedance was within range and stable.
The threshold testing was causing visible stim, and the patient was uncomfortable. It was determined that the atrial lead was dislodged, and the patient was sent for a revision. Notice the surface electrogram compared to the atrial bipolar channel. The intracardiac signals are great, but surface never lies!
This is an example of a PMT episode that is successfully terminated with the algorithm AP on PMT (Abbott). The PMT detection rate is 120bpm.
The device detected eight consecutive VP-AS intervals with a rate higher than the PMT detection rate (appx. 120), the device then calculated the stability of the eight VP-AS intervals.
The device averages eight VP-AS intervals and compares that average to each of the individual intervals.
In this example, all VP-AS intervals are within 16 ms of the average, therefore considered stable. When the VP-AS are considered stable, the device modifies the AV delay for the ninth interval to confirm the diagnosis of PMT. If one of the eight intervals varied by >16 ms from the average, the VP-AS intervals are considered unstable and the next eight beats are monitored.
The sensed AV delay is shortened by 50 ms if the programmed Sensed AV (AS-VP) interval is ≥100 ms.
The sensed AV delay is lengthened by 50 ms if the programmed Sensed AV (AS-VP) interval is <100 ms.
The next VP-AS interval is then analyzed. If the VP-AS is unchanged, the P-wave is considered retrograde with suspicion of PMT, (as shown in this example)
If the e next VP-AS was different than >16ms, the P wave is not considered retrograde (no PMT). The algorithm may be repeated after 256 beats.
PMT was suspected, therefore the next ventricular pulse (10th cycle) is inhibited.
An atrial pulse is delivered 330 ms after the detected retrograde P wave.
The atrial pulse is followed by ventricular pacing at the end of the AV delay if needed.
The atrial pulse is inhibited if a P wave is sensed (AS) within a 210 ms alert period following the absolute atrial refractory period.
The AP on PMT treatment algorithm was successful, and normal AP with conduction followed.
The following EGMs are from a routine Sorin dual chamber pacemaker interrogation. Both EGMs were stored as “V Bursts”.
What is your analysis? The patient has complete heart block. Sensing, threshold, and impedance measurements were all stable.
AP 3%, VP >99%
The first recorded episode contains NSVT with appropriate sensing.
The second recording shows noise on both the atrial lead and ventricular lead happening concurrently. The noise on the RV lead is causing ventricular pacing inhibition with two approximately 2 second pauses.
Noise was not reproducible with isometrics or pocket manipulation. There was no prior evidence of lead noise. RV sensitivity was decreased from 1.8mV to 3.0mV to avoid oversensing/pacing inhibition on the RV lead due to the patient being dependent. Asynchronous programming was not considered at this time to maintain AV synchrony given the patient has intact sinus node function, but also to be able to detect future VT episodes.